Electron Speed Calculator

How fast is an electron moving at a given energy or voltage?

Enter the kinetic energy or accelerating voltage applied to an electron and get its speed — both as a fraction of the speed of light and in meters per second. The calculator applies relativistic correction automatically, so results stay accurate even at high energies where classical physics breaks down.

Updated June 2026 · How this works

Example calculation — edit any field to use your own numbers

Worth knowing
How It Works
The formula, explained simply

Imagine pushing a shopping cart. At low speeds, doubling your push roughly doubles the cart speed. But if the cart somehow grew heavier the faster it moved, you would need exponentially more force for each small gain in speed. That is exactly what happens to an electron near the speed of light — its relativistic momentum increases far faster than its velocity.

The calculation starts by converting your input into kinetic energy in electron-volts. One electron-volt is the energy gained by a single electron charge accelerated through one volt of potential difference. For an accelerating voltage V, the kinetic energy is simply V eV — a direct consequence of how electric potential energy converts to kinetic energy for a singly-charged particle.

From kinetic energy, the tool calculates the Lorentz factor gamma = 1 + KE / 0.511 MeV, where 0.511 MeV is the electron rest energy. The speed then follows as v = c times sqrt(1 - 1/gamma^2). At low energies gamma is barely above 1 and the formula reproduces classical results. At 0.511 MeV kinetic energy, gamma equals exactly 2 and the electron travels at 86.6% of c. There is no shortcut formula that works across all energy ranges — the full relativistic expression is required.

When To Use This
Right tool, right situation

Use this calculator when you need to know whether an electron beam or atomic electron is in the relativistic regime — for instance, when designing shielding for an electron accelerator, estimating the de Broglie wavelength in electron microscopy, or checking whether a particle simulation needs relativistic dynamics enabled.

This tool is also the right choice when converting between common representations: voltage, eV, keV, MeV, and joules all appear in different literature and instrument specs, and the unit conversion alone saves time. The Lorentz factor output tells you directly how much the effective mass has increased, which feeds into momentum and wavelength calculations downstream.

This tool is not appropriate for protons, ions, or other particles — the rest mass 0.511 MeV is specific to electrons. It also does not account for energy loss from synchrotron radiation, bremsstrahlung, or collisional stopping power. In a real beam, electrons lose energy to their environment, so the input value should represent energy at the point of interest, not the source. For electrons already traveling through material, a dedicated stopping-power table is more accurate.

Common Mistakes
Why results sometimes look wrong

The most common mistake is using the classical kinetic energy formula KE = 0.5mv^2 to back-calculate speed at high energies. At 1 MeV this formula predicts a speed of about 1.87 times c — an impossible result. The error is not a rounding issue; the formula itself fails because it does not account for the increase in relativistic momentum. Always use the Lorentz-factor form for electrons above about 10 keV.

A second frequent error is confusing accelerating voltage with kinetic energy in joules. One electron-volt equals 1.602 times 10^-19 joules. Plugging a voltage value directly into a formula that expects joules overstates the energy by a factor of about 6.2 times 10^18, producing speeds far above c that expose the error immediately — but only if you check for it.

A subtler mistake involves ignoring the rest mass in the gamma formula. Some quick-reference formulas approximate gamma as KE / (m_e * c^2) for ultra-relativistic electrons, which works above about 10 MeV. Applying that shortcut at 100 keV gives gamma = 0.196 — less than 1 — which is physically nonsense. The correct form is always gamma = 1 + KE / (m_e * c^2), where the 1 represents the rest energy contribution.

The Math
Worked examples and deeper derivation

The relativistic kinetic energy relation is: KE = (gamma - 1) times m_e times c^2, where gamma = 1 / sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2). Rearranging for speed: v = c times sqrt(1 - 1/gamma^2), with gamma = 1 + KE / (m_e * c^2).

In practical units, m_e * c^2 = 0.511 MeV = 511,000 eV. So for an accelerating voltage V in volts, KE = V eV, and gamma = 1 + V / 511,000. At 511 V the correction is 0.1%, barely measurable. At 51,100 V it is 10%, and at 511 kV gamma equals 2.0 exactly.

The classical approximation v_classical = sqrt(2 * KE / m_e) works when KE is much less than 0.511 MeV. The fractional error in speed between classical and relativistic treatments is approximately (3/8) times beta^2 at low speeds, reaching about 4% at beta = 0.3 and 15% at beta = 0.5. Beyond beta = 0.7 the classical result becomes qualitatively wrong.

Electron gun in a CRT television (25 kV)
Accelerating voltage: 25,000 V
An electron accelerated through 25,000 volts reaches about 30% of the speed of light — roughly 90,000 km/s. At this speed the Lorentz factor is about 1.05, meaning relativistic mass increase is only 5%. Classical mechanics gives a result that is off by just a few percent, which is why CRT engineers could design without full relativistic treatment. But the correction is not zero, and ignoring it entirely in precision work introduces detectable error.
Medical linear accelerator at 6 MeV
Kinetic energy: 6 MeV
A 6 MeV electron used in radiation therapy travels at about 99.6% of the speed of light, with a Lorentz factor near 12.7. At this point classical kinetic energy (0.5mv^2) predicts a speed higher than light — a nonsensical result. The relativistic formula is not optional here; it is the only physically meaningful calculation. Radiation oncology physicists use the full relativistic expression to model dose deposition accurately.
Electron in a hydrogen atom ground state (classical estimate)
Kinetic energy: 13.6 eV
The Bohr model assigns the ground-state electron roughly 13.6 eV of kinetic energy. Plugging this in gives a speed of about 0.73% of c — or around 2,187 km/s. The Lorentz factor is essentially 1.000027, confirming that relativistic effects on the electron mass in hydrogen are negligible. However, relativistic corrections do matter in heavier atoms where inner-shell electrons reach 10-20% of c, explaining why gold and mercury have anomalous colors and chemical properties.
Expert Unlock
The thing most explanations skip

The formula assumes the electron is a free particle in vacuum with no electromagnetic radiation loss. In a synchrotron or circular accelerator, electrons above roughly 1 MeV radiate significant energy as synchrotron radiation — the power scales as gamma^4, meaning a doubling of gamma increases radiation losses by a factor of 16. At several GeV the radiated power can exceed the applied RF power, setting a practical ceiling on achievable beam energy in circular machines. The straight-line (linear) accelerator architecture exists specifically to sidestep this gamma^4 penalty.

What happens to electron speed at very high voltages?

How fast does an electron move in a 100 kV electron microscope?
At 100 kV accelerating voltage, an electron reaches about 54.8% of the speed of light — roughly 164,000 km/s. The Lorentz factor at that energy is about 1.196, meaning the electron behaves as if its mass is nearly 20% higher than its rest mass. Transmission electron microscopes (TEMs) operating at 200-300 kV push electrons to 65-75% of c, making relativistic correction essential for accurate wavelength calculations.
What is the de Broglie wavelength of a relativistic electron?
The de Broglie wavelength of an electron is lambda = h / (gamma * m_e * v), where the relativistic momentum must be used at high speeds. At 100 kV the wavelength is about 3.7 picometers — far smaller than an atom. This tiny wavelength is what makes electron microscopes capable of atomic-resolution imaging, something impossible with visible light.
Why does classical mechanics give wrong electron speeds at high energies?
Classical mechanics assumes that kinetic energy is 0.5 times mass times velocity squared, with mass fixed. Relativity shows that as speed increases, momentum grows faster than velocity — effectively acting as an increasing resistance to further acceleration. At 10 MeV, the classical formula predicts a speed about 4.4 times the speed of light, which is physically impossible. The relativistic formula correctly caps all speeds below c.

Need something this doesn't cover?

Suggest a tool — we'll build it →